![]() Sonix and Rev each transcribed a Spanish interview clearly, identifying different speakers and requiring minimal edits - though more edits were needed than with the English interview. Otter and Parrot are both English only, a disappointing limitation when so many languages are spoken worldwide. If you want to transcribe non-English interviews But that option is also limited in Otter’s free plan. However, unlike the others, this word-tracking doesn’t work well when editing.Īnother time-saving note: In Otter, Rev and Sonix, you can add common words (jargon, acronyms, names of people, etc.) to a glossary or dictionary to teach the AI to recognize them each time you upload a recording. If you click on a word, the audio will pick up from that spot. Like Otter, Rev and Sonix – Parrot will automatically scroll and follow each word in the transcript as the audio plays. Parrot had some inconsistencies that might be annoying for AP style devotees – such as writing fifth grade and 6th grade these two different ways, or missing capitalization – but it was mostly accurate. Rev was not far behind at 4 minutes 30 seconds.Īnother plus for multi-tasking journalists: Sonix, Rev and Otter send email alerts when your transcription is finished. In just under 3 minutes, Sonix uploaded and transcribed the interview. So, we timed how long it took for each service to upload and transcribe the 25-minute interview. This is often the top reason journalists seek a transcription service: If we can spend more time reporting and writing, and less time transcribing interviews, that’s a win. We tested each of these in the transcription services to explore different formats, languages and background noise. We tested one professional recorded English interview, a Spanish interview recorded as an iPhone video, as well as a Zoom interview recorded with smartphones. ![]() We partnered with KBIA to run an audio interview through each of these services: Parrot AI, Otter AI, Google Pinpoint, Rev and Sonix. ![]() While we could not test every AI transcription service out there, we chose five options that we found highly recommended and/or free alternatives with unique tools that could be helpful in day-to-day reporting. Otter still cannot transcribe non-English languages, and the paid levels are not always an affordable choice for smaller newsrooms or freelancers. But with the departure of their unrestricted free version, journalists have realized that Otter has limitations that make it worth it to look around at other emerging options. The popular transcription platform has saved us loads of time by transforming recorded interviews into transcripts that are editable, searchable and shareable. For many, Otter.ai has been a loyal friend for years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |